| Overview | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
![]() |
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
| Who? | What | Points | Action | Lap | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1996 – Belgian Grand Prix | |||||
| Misc | |||||
| Williams |
|
10 pts | After Verstappen’s accident the safety car came out. Villeneuve missed his pit stop. Hill was entering the pit lane when the team radioed him not to come in. He had to go though the mini chicane to rejoin the track. The mistake cost Hill dearly. |
||
| 1996 – Japanese Grand Prix | |||||
| Misc | |||||
| Williams |
|
1 pts | At Jacques’s second pit stop the mechanics failed to get Villeneuve’s right rear wheel nut on properly. The right rear wheel flew off the car a couple of laps later ending the French Canadian’s championship. |
||
| 1995 – Brazilian Grand Prix | |||||
| Misc | |||||
| Williams |
|
3 pts | Thirty minutes before the start of the race, the stewards formally advised Williams and Benetton that the fuel samples taken from David Coulthard’s Williams and Michael Schumacher’s Benetton were irregular. (They differed to the samples that the teams had to submit prior to the race.) Thus, the two drivers had to compete in the race “provisionally” and the teams were to be fined $300,000 each. Nether team told its driver. It transpired that the fuel supplied by Elf was not illegal but it was irregular. The drivers kept there points from the race but the teams were not awarded the points for the Constructors Championship. |
||
| 1994 – British Grand Prix | |||||
| Misc | |||||
| Williams |
|
5 pts | Damon hill lost the entire first free practice session due to an unfortunate occurrence. Hill left the pits as normal and toured round slowly. As he approached Beckets the front two wheels began to wobble madly. Hill suspected some sort of suspension failure and stop the car there and then. He got out and inspected the car and found that the front wishbones had become detached from the monocoque. As Hill walked back to the pits he meat Patrick Head and he imparted the news to the bemused technical director. On inspection the problem was found to be “car assembly problems.” To you and me that means that someone did not fasten some nuts or bolts! |
||
| 1994 – European Grand Prix | |||||
| Misc | |||||
| Williams |
|
8 pts | At Hill’s first refuelling stop on lap eighteen there was a problem with his refuelling rig. He was short filled by some thirteen litres. He had to pit early for his second stop and take on and extra fourteen litres of fuel to what he would have taken. His was disastrous for Hill’s race because his two-stop strategy had been on course to beat Schumacher’s three-stop strategy. |
||
| Williams |
|
8 pts | On lap forty-five Mansell came in for a refuelling stop. As he pulled away a sharp-eyed mechanic noticed a loose blot on the front wing endplate. Mansell was subsequently called back in for a precautionary stop as the loss of a front wing endplate could have resulted in a loss of control with disastrous consequences. Three laps later Mansell stopped to have the bolt checked. Frank Williams admitted it was the team who was at fault; “Nigel’s last stop was due to a Williams team cock-up.” |
||
| 1993 – Canadian Grand Prix | |||||
| Misc | |||||
| Williams |
|
9 pts | Williams made a complete mess of hills first tyre stop. The right rear was not there and had to be fetched from the pit garage. The delay was caused when one of the mechanics noticed they were going to fit Prost’s tyres to Hill’s car. Hill lost a huge amount of time in the agonising 16.3 second stop, dropping him from second to fourth, allowing Senna through. Hill was not happy, “I’m obviously happy to have finished third but I am not sure about the problem at the pit stop. I was surprised to see guys rushing around to look for new tyre. Then I found I did not have as much of an advantage on the new tyres as I thought I would have done.“ |
||
| 1991 – Belgian Grand Prix | |||||
| Misc | |||||
| Williams |
|
5 pts | After Saturday’s qualifying session Patrese’s Williams was among a number of cars that were selected randomly for scrutineering. It was discovered that although the car had a reverse gear and the necessary components to work the gear an electronic problem prevented the reverse gear being selected. The rules stated that the car must have a selectable reverse gear. Patrese’s Saturday times were disallowed and as a result his Friday time was one that accounted for his lowly seventeenth place on the grid. |
||
| 1991 – Portuguese Grand Prix | |||||
| Misc | |||||
| Williams |
|
4 pts | Williams had a disastrous pit stop for Mansell on lap thirty that would end in Mansell’s disqualification. Patrick head speaking for BBC television gave the following analysis. “In the sequence that occurs when the nuts are undone, the wheels come off and the new ones go on, there is a position where the chaps on the guns stand up in the air holding their guns above their heads. That is a signal to the jack man that their job is complete, the nuts are tight and the persona controlling the pit-stop can step away and let the car out. In that process there was a breakdown. The right-rear wheel was not complete and the guys had not given the signal that they had completed their job, but the process that allowed the car to leave the pits was allowed to occur.” Pete Windsor was the lollypop man and was in charge of giving the driver the signal to leave the pit box. It appeared that he took his cue from the rear jack man who lowered the car and he gave the signal to let Mansell go. Mansell accelerated away, only for the unsecured right-rear wheel to fall off. This was a setback but it turned into disaster when an order to bring the car back to the pit on wheel jack to the pits was ignored and the mechanics rushed out and fixed the wheel on in the fast lane of the pit lane. This is was not allowed under article 133 in the rules which specifically states that work on the cars can only be carried out in the inner lane in the pits. Mansell rejoined but there was an incredible gap until the inevitable black flag came out, Mansell’s championship hopes in tatters. |
||
| 1998 – Luxemburg Grand Prix | |||||
| Misc | |||||
| Williams |
|
4 pts | Villeneuve was planning to make just one refuelling stop in the race. He took this on lap thirty one but due to a problem with the refuelling rig he was short filled and had to pit again on lap forty five, dropping him from sixth to eleventh. Nice pitwork by Williams! |
||
| 1999 – Belgian Grand Prix | |||||
| Misc | |||||
| Williams |
|
1 pts | Salo had been told by Ferrari to act as a rear gunner for Eddie Irvine. He kept Ralf Schumacher behind in the later stages of the race much to the thinly veiled anger of Patrick Head. “Unfortunately Ralf fell foul of Ferrari’s cynical approach running a one car team with a blocking tactic to protect Irvine’s position and I am very surprised that Mika Salo was prepared to accept such orders from the pits,” seethed Head. He then went on to praise McLaren’s two-car team and let it be known that he hoped they would win both Championships that year. |
||
| 2002 – Australian Grand Prix | |||||
| Misc | |||||
| Williams |
|
4 pts | Patrick Head?s thoughts on the proposed, one engine per team rule. Patrick Head spoke out about the proposed rule change that would restrict the number of engines allowed in a race weekend. Publicly the FIA states this is to reduce the cost of running a F1 team. However, given recent F1 history Head’s thoughts seem equally, if not more valid. It’s politics. As it is at the moment, Michelin tyres are very good, but they need scrubbing for 10 laps, sometimes 15. If you have a two-stop race that means we have to do 45 laps to prepare our tyres for the race.” Head explained, “Now, if you are Ferrari, with tyres that don’t need scrubbing and with Michael Schumacher, who only needs one lap to get a time out of the car, your best way of doing damage to your two serious competitors is to propose one engine for a weekend. “It’s all politics. We are being manipulated. That’s what’s going on.” |
||
| 2002 – Brazilian Grand Prix | |||||
| Misc | |||||
| Williams |
|
1 pts | Patrick Head?s efforts to make trouble for Ferrari after the FIA gave them special dispensation to have more sets of tyres allocated to Michael Schumacher on the account of him having two different specification cars at the Grand Prix. On the Friday a row broke out between Ferrari and the other teams. Ferrari again to proved to provide a bone of contention for Williams’ Patrick Head. Michael Schumacher had one F2002 and one F2001 at his disposal for the three days at Interlagos and it was believed that the FIA was going to allow the Ferrari driver to use four sets of tyres for each car as the two contenders have different rims. The rules state that each driver and not each car is allocated four sets of tyres and Head found it necessary to voice his opinion on the matter. “Always got to grump about something! Well, we are still not quite clear what the situation is but from what I hear the FIA have approved that Michael, tomorrow, can have four sets of tyres available for the 2002 car and four sets available for the 2001 car,” Head said. “If that is correct then it is completely against article 80C of the sporting code that says that the driver, not the car but the driver, is allocated four sets of tyres. I understand they have got a problem that the wheels of one car do not fit the wheels of the other car, so I can see why they would want to do it, but, in our understanding, it doesn’t comply with article 80C, so we will certainly be having some discussions. It may not be the case. Every now and again a wind-up goes up and down the pitlane and one has to be careful not to over- react.” However, it appeared the situation was sorted Sporting Director of Ferrari, Jean Tobt, stating that if Michael Schumacher were forced to switch from the F2002 to F2001, then the number of tyres used on the first car would be deducted from the four of the other. |
||
| 2002 – Spanish Grand Prix | |||||
| Misc | |||||
| Williams |
|
1 pts | What was noticeable about the Williams cars in qualifying was that they were going much faster than expected. Before the race Gerhard Berger had told ITV reporters that the team had been running in practice with heavy fuel loads. This would account for the apparent sandbagging. Admittedly the car?s balance had not been good but the large defect that the team had reversed seemed to be largely an artefact of sandbagging, a useful tool in the world of Formula 1 tactics. What was noticeable about the Williams cars in qualifying was that they were going much faster than expected. Before the race Gerhard Berger had told ITV reporters that the team had been running in practice with heavy fuel loads. This would account for the apparent sandbagging. Admittedly the car’s balance had not been good but the large defect that the team had reversed seemed to be largely an artefact of sandbagging, a useful tool in the world of Formula 1 tactics. |
||
| Williams |
|
1 pts | The error by the lollipop man that caused Montoya to run him over during Montoya?s last pitstop. On lap forty-five Montoya had a net ten-second advantage over Coulthard to make his final pitstop. There was plenty of time and the stop should have been carried out in a smooth unhurried fashion. However, the lollipop, Carl Gaden man signalled Montoya to go before the refuelled hose had been pulled from the car. He realised the problem and tried to stop Montoya but his foot is run was by the Colombian. Montoya stooped and the mechanics released Gaden’s foot from beneath the front left tyre. Montoya then departed, still with an advantage over Coulthard, but reduced to five seconds. Gaden was shaken but was uninjured apart from a bruised foot. ”I am very pleased with my second place, mostly because we struggled the whole weekend here. Even if we are a bit behind Ferrari this was the best we could do today,” Juan said after the race. “In my second pit stop I hit our chief mechanic who was trying to stop me after he started to lift the lollipop as the refuelling wasn’t finished yet. I know he is all right now but this accident could have had a much worse outcome if I hadn’t managed to stop the car fairly quickly.” |
||
| 2002 – Austrian Grand Prix | |||||
| Misc | |||||
| Williams |
|
1 pts | Hitting out at Ferrari after they forced Barrichello to surrender his race win to Schumacher in the interests of the team. In the after math of the 2002 Austrian Grand Prix Williams Patrick Head joined Flavio Briatore in hitting out at Ferrari after they ordered Rubens Barrichello to sacrifice the race win he had earned to Michael Schumacher. This was devised as a move to help Schumacher win the driver’s championship for the good of the team. In reality the 2002 Ferrari was a second a lap faster than another car and as such Schumacher’s only real competition for 2002 would come form his teammate, but this would not be allowed by the team. “I feel very sorry for Rubens and I have to say that that was the most cynical event that I’ve experienced in 27 years in Formula One. We are trying to deliver motor sport but what Ferrari showed today was disgusting cinema,” Head said. “I think for a team like Ferrari, when you have produced a car as brilliant as they have done, you have an obligation to Formula One and to the spectators and that is to provide a motor race. When we produced a car that was ahead of the others we provided some motor racing. We have an obligation to motor sport and the public and it was ignored today. That obligation is against anything they might have in a contract with Michael Schumacher. This is the first time I have ever heard anyone booing a winner in Formula One. It was the most cynical end to a Grand Prix I have seen.” BMW motorsport director and ex-Ferrari driver, Gerhard Berger was also disgusted by the display that unfolded at his home event, stating that the FIA need to look into the situation. “It’s a terrible decision. I can understand it if you are fighting for the championship but there was no need for this so early in the season and the FIA should look into it. If you were a betting man, you wouldn’t be happy,” he said, raising yet another issue. |
||
| 2002 – Canadian Grand Prix | |||||
| Misc | |||||
| Williams |
|
1 pts | The problem with the refuelling rig during Ralf?s last stop that forced him to stop gain. On lap forty-two Ralf Schumacher pitted from fourth place and fell back to seventh. There was a problem with the refuelling machinery and Ralf had to return to the pits two laps later for fuel. |
||
| 2002 – European Grand Prix | |||||
| Misc | |||||
| Williams |
|
4 pts | Montoya?s exhaust problems in Friday Free Practice. Things were not looking so smooth at Willaims in Friday Free practice. Following two engine failures in the last two races and another failure in testing for Juan Pablo Montoya their reliability was looking fragile. Montoya’s car needed an exhaust change and as he battled the problem on the track he put the car over the grass. “It hasn’t been a very positive day for me as I am still struggling with the balance of the car,” Montoya explained. “I also had a problem with an exhaust, which I experienced halfway through the second session which hampered my work. Last, but not least, I think that the new chicane is much too slow for me, I preferred it as it was before. Let’s see how we can improve the car for tomorrow.” |
||
| Williams |
|
4 pts | The suspected vibration in Montoya?s car that resulted in him missing the majority of the warm-up session, preventing him scrubbing in tyres for the race. Montoya lost time in the pre-race warm-up session while the team investigated a suspected vibration. Unable to locate any problem, the team sent Montoya out. After loosing valuable tyre scrubbing time he was further frustrated when he had a slight 0ff-track excursion although the car was undamaged. The lack of scrubbed tyres was to seriously handicap Montoya in the race. |
||
| 2002 – British Grand Prix | |||||
| Misc | |||||
| Williams |
|
7 pts | The confusion during Ralf?s pit-stop on lap thirteen while the Willaims mechanics scrabbled to find wet weather tyres for the German. On lap thirteen, both Montoya and Ralf pitted to take on wet weather tyres. Montoya was leading the race and arrived at the teams pit box first whilst Ralf queued behind the Colombian for service. When Ralf’s turn came around there was confusion in the Williams pit and the German lost precious seconds as the mechanics scrabbled to find tyres for the German. |
||
| Williams |
|
7 pts | The malfunctioning refuelling rig that turned Ralf Schumacher?s stop on lap thirty-one into an embarrassing debacle. On lap thirty-one Ralf Schumacher came in to the pits for his refuelling stop but the refuelling rig malfunctioned and then the spare malfunctioned too. Ralf lost a huge amount of time before the mechanics sent him out to circulate the track while they found a solution to the problem. The difficulties were overcome and Ralf was subsequently able to stop again to take on fuel but the loss of time put him over a lap behind race leader, Michael Schumacher. “Third place was the maximum we could achieve today,” admitted Willaims technical guru, Mario Theissen. “It was not the first time that there have been have problems with the fuel rig, unfortunately this time it was us. In nearly every race, one team or another has problems with refuelling, so improvements are really required. Ralf lost fourth place because of this today. We had no problems with the engine but it could be seen that in the wet conditions that we are behind our competitors with our tyres. The race was a great show for the spectators and both our drivers showed a solid performance and made no mistakes in the tricky conditions.” |
||
| 2002 – Italian Grand Prix | |||||
| Misc | |||||
| Williams |
|
1 pts | Ralf using the T-car in the race due to a fuel supply problem on his race car. Ralf Schumacher was forced to start the race in the T-car due to a suspected fuel supply problem with his race car. |
||
| 2002 – Japanese Grand Prix | |||||
| Misc | |||||
| Williams |
|
1 pts | Seeking Prost TV money back off Minardi At the 2002 Japanese Grand Prix Minardi team principal, Paul Stoddart threatened Stoddart fully believed he was entitled to the funds and Bernie Ecclestone "I will turn my back on Formula One if this travesty of injustice is "In the last 12 months we have been through so many problems, the sport |
||
| 2003 – Australian Grand Prix | |||||
| Race | |||||
| Williams |
|
4 pts | Problem with Ralf’s right rear tyre during lap 17 pit stop Following Webber’s exit form the race on lap sixteen due to a suspension failure Williams pitted Montoya and Ralf at the same time, the German queuing behind |
||
| 2003 – San Marino Grand Prix | |||||
| Race | |||||
| Williams |
|
4 pts | The refuelling rig problem that resulted in Montoya making an etxra, unscheduled stop On lap thirty Montoya was running in fifth position when he pulled in the pits Thing suddenly got worst for Montoya, the fuel rig failed to deploy but the |
||
| 2011 – Spanish Grand Prix | |||||
| Race | |||||
| Williams |
|
1 pts | Barrichello’s pit stop was not not at all smooth. In the usual hurry to get Barrichello on his way again, the right rear wheel proved troublesome and was slow to be changed. |
13 | |
| 2012 – Spanish Grand Prix | |||||
| Race | |||||
| Williams |
|
3 pts | Leading the race, Maldonado stopped but had a slow stop. The left-rear wheel seemed to have issues and the slow stop reduced the gap to Alonso more than Williams wanted. However, Maldonado retained the lead of the race. |
42 | |